ARRIVING AT OUR FINAL SOLUTION
Overcoming Challenges.
During our development process, a challenge that our design team encountered was the decision on how we wanted to design the main home screen. Given that we had two varying designs, including a map-oriented view that provides users with the opportunity to visualize available cleanups through proximity and a list-oriented view that groups the necessary information for each available cleanup into an intuitive, straightforward interface, we needed to discern which was more adequate in terms of a clear, usability criteria.
We accomplished this by conducting A/B testing with a group of fifteen potential users between the ages 21-40. Twelve of those sessions were completed using remote communications and three in-person. From these sessions, we were able to gather that...
7 OUT OF 15 CHOSE the...
Map-oriented view.
These participants believed it was the more intuitive to use method for viewing all relevant locations (i.e. reported areas for waste and already organized cleanup parties).
6 OUT OF 15 CHOSE the...
List-oriented view.
One of the positive aspects these participants shared was that all of the required information for each displayed cleanup event was available at a glance
2 OUT OF 15 users...
Had no preference.
Users believed that both prototypes were adequate in providing support for achieving their specified goals.
Taking into consideration the split results of our user testing, there was no definitive evidence that one prototype greatly outperformed the other in terms of usability. With our prospective users front of mind, we came to the collective conclusion that including both designs for the main home screen into the final high-fidelity prototype would prioritize the needs of all users by providing them with the tools they deem necessary to reach their goals.